Or perhaps it's something even fundamentally worse than this, the thinking that strategy games are incaptitible of delivering story telling comparable to that of RPGs.
#WHAT BIOWARE GAMES ARE ALLOWED TO BE PLAYED ON YOUTUBE PC#
With no interest in playing pc games, or specifically, control schemes better suited for the pc. The only hypothetical I could come to, is that they were console gamers. Given how formulaic Bioware has become, how focused action games have become with strategy games becoming increasingly rationed, why exactly would this be a bad thing?
Why should a developer, yet unproven in that specific feild "stick to what they are good at"? They also make Starcraft, probably the most popular strategy game in existence. Bliizzard make RPGs, very succeful and praised ones such as Diablo and World Of Warcraft. "Bioware should stick to what they are good at".įirstly, this argument that if you make a specific genre of game, in the case of Bioware, RPG's, strikes me as preposterous. When simply asking people why they had this response, they replied "because I don't like strategy games". So, it doesn't exactly seem that the talent is so far above the genre that it's inconsequential. For a strategy game, this is of the upmost importance. The thing I found odd about this, Bioware can't make balanced games. Like, somehow Bioware was above this genre.
The initial response of the users was along the lines of " this is a waste of Biowares time". I was browsing another forum some months back when EA announced Bioware (not really Bioware just the name whored around due to Bioware having no self-respect these days) had a new command and conquer game in works during the awful spike awards.